Assessing the Power of Prostitution Policies to Shift Markets, Attitudes, and Ideologies

Posted: 18 Jan 2019

Date Written: January 2019

Abstract

Since the late 1990s, many countries have been debating what prostitution policies to apply, and, particularly in Europe, several have changed the overall approach to the phenomenon and the people involved. Prostitution is more than ever before firmly placed on policy agendas as a topic related to gender equality and globalization. Furthermore, it is seen in context with issues relating to organized crime, health, and gentrification. In both policy debates and the academic discourse, particular ways of regulating prostitution are treated as models and a central discussion is which model among these works best. In this article, I argue that this search for a best practice of prostitution policy that can be transferred to and work similarly in a new jurisdiction builds on a lack of understanding of the importance of context and implementation. How policies work depends on, among other factors, aims, implementation structures, and characteristics of local prostitution markets. But I present a broad spectrum of research to clarify what should be taken into consideration when assessing policies’ abilities to achieve diverse goals. I argue that a fundamental problem in both prostitution policy debates and scholarship is that the arguments over prostitution policies have become too detached from the many and differing contexts in which these policies operate and I propose a way forward for research.

Suggested Citation

Skilbrei, May-Len, Assessing the Power of Prostitution Policies to Shift Markets, Attitudes, and Ideologies (January 2019). Annual Review of Criminology, Vol. 2, pp. 493-508, 2019, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3317427 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011518-024623

May-Len Skilbrei (Contact Author)

University of Oslo ( email )

Domus Nova, 5.-7.fl.
St. Olavs plass 5
Oslo, 0130
Norway

HOME PAGE: http://www.jus.uio.no/ikrs/english/people/aca/mlskilbr/index.html

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
223
PlumX Metrics