Why Contracts are Written in 'Legalese'
26 Pages Posted: 1 Feb 2003
Abstract
Business contracts have been reviled since before the Marx Brothers' infamous 'there ain't no Sanity Clause' sketch as being replete with duplicative, cumbersome, inartful, and sometimes imprecise language. My article seeks to understand why practice apparently hasn't made perfect - why business contracts are not as clear, and only as long, as would seem to be optimal. I argue that the contract production process combines rational, and what some would consider irrational, elements to create a serviceable, but arguably second-best, product. I discuss dynamics of law firms and their clients that contribute to the continuing viability of an 'imperfect product.'
JEL Classification: L2, K22, L14
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Would Collective Action Clauses Raise Borrowing Costs?
By Barry Eichengreen and Ashoka Mody
-
Financial Crises and Reform of the International Financial System
-
Bankruptcy Procedures for Sovereigns: A History of Ideas, 1976-2001
-
Structuring and Restructuring Sovereign Debt: The Role of Seniority
By Patrick Bolton and Olivier Jeanne
-
Structuring and Restructuring Sovereign Debt: The Role of Seniority
By Patrick Bolton and Olivier Jeanne
-
Structuring and Restructuring Sovereign Debt: The Role of a Bankruptcy Regime
By Patrick Bolton and Olivier Jeanne
-
Sovereign Bonds and the Collective Will
By Lee C. Buchheit, Mitu Gulati, ...
-
Exit Consents in Sovereign Bond Exchanges
By Lee C. Buchheit and Mitu Gulati