Challenges To 'A Most Dangerous Doctrine' or a 'Fantastic Theory' of Volitional Insanity

C Gavaghan and A Bastani, “Challenges to "a Most Dangerous Doctrine" or a "Fantastic Theory" of Volitional Insanity” VUW Law Review (2016); 47(4)

40 Pages Posted: 8 Mar 2019

See all articles by Amir Bastani

Amir Bastani

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Colin Gavaghan

University of Bristol

Date Written: 2016

Abstract

In theory, an insanity defence can take two forms: the cognitive form (C-insanity) and the volitional form (V-insanity). The defence of C-insanity recognises that a disordered state of mind can make the ability to understand the nature of an action impossible. On the other hand, V-insanity is recognised in some common law jurisdictions, such as all jurisdictions in Australia except for Victoria and New South Wales, and is a full defence. It recognises that a disordered state of mind can make the exercise of self-control impossible. However, that disordered state of mind does not necessarily affect the understanding of the nature of the act impossible.

Keywords: Insanity, Mental capacity, Criminal law, Defences, Common law

JEL Classification: K00, K14

Suggested Citation

Bastani, Amir and Gavaghan, Colin, Challenges To 'A Most Dangerous Doctrine' or a 'Fantastic Theory' of Volitional Insanity (2016). C Gavaghan and A Bastani, “Challenges to "a Most Dangerous Doctrine" or a "Fantastic Theory" of Volitional Insanity” VUW Law Review (2016); 47(4), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3336384

Amir Bastani

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Colin Gavaghan (Contact Author)

University of Bristol ( email )

Bristol
United Kingdom

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
130
Abstract Views
628
Rank
398,118
PlumX Metrics