On the Clear Evidence of the Risks to Children from Smartphone and Wifi Radio Frequency Radiation

Posted: 26 Mar 2019

Date Written: March 3, 2019

Abstract

Children’s health and well-being is under significant threat from everyday digital technologies, as the past 15 years have seen the proliferation of microwave Radio Frequency Radiation (RFR) devices in the home, school and society. The safety standards for such devices — smartphones, tablets etc. — were based on the proven thermal effects of microwave devices in adults, not children. Scientists in the life sciences have long been aware of equally harmful non-thermal effects. However, physicists and engineers have operated on the theory that non-ionizing RFR could not directly damage human DNA and lead to cancer, as it was far less powerful than ionizing radiation (x-rays, nuclear etc.). That theory has been solidly and roundly refuted, as this paper illustrates. Cancer risks aside, research studies have demonstrated that low-intensity RFR elicits a range of pathophysiological conditions in experimental animals and humans. This is why parents, educators and governments should be alarmed and take immediate and appropriate action. There is clear ignorance on such matters among parents, educators and governments, as well as academics across the natural, life and social sciences. In response, this paper aims to inform by presenting clear evidence, in a balanced manner, of the risks to children based on proven scientific theories and empirical evidence. The paper concludes by offering practical advice on how the risks to children, and indeed adults, can be minimised.

Keywords: Risk, Digital Technology, Radio Frequency Radiation, Health, Safety

JEL Classification: I18, L63

Suggested Citation

Butler, Tom, On the Clear Evidence of the Risks to Children from Smartphone and Wifi Radio Frequency Radiation (March 3, 2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3345910

Tom Butler (Contact Author)

UCC ( email )

5 Bloomfield Terrace Western Road
Cork
Ireland

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
737
PlumX Metrics