Tradeoffs in Undercover Investigations: A Comparative Perspective

Posted: 13 Dec 2002

See all articles by Jacqueline E. Ross

Jacqueline E. Ross

University of Illinois College of Law

Abstract

Different countries vary significantly in their attitudes to the legitimacy of undercover investigations and in their approaches to regulating them. This review essay examines two wide-ranging anthologies that have collected the contributions of legal scholars, sociologists, criminologists, police officials and policymakers in an effort to illuminate the differing national contours of the debate about undercover policing: Undercover: Police Surveillance in Comparative Perspective, Cyrille Fijnaut and Gary T. Marx, eds. (Kluwer, 1995), and Undercover Policing and Accountability from an International Perspective, Monica den Boer, ed. (European Institute of Public Administration, 1997). The essay goes beyond the books under review to identify nine separate tradeoffs among competing goals, interests, and strategies in undercover operations that different countries negotiate in dissimilar ways, but which all of them must confront. This is the main contribution of the review. Distinguishing policy, institutional, and political tradeoffs makes it possible to understand the variety of approaches to domestic and international undercover policing as compromises struck between competing values and techniques. The essay also explores the ways in which these tradeoffs have been complicated by the growing importance of transnational undercover investigations after the September 11th attacks.

Keywords: criminal law, criminal procedure, comparative, undercover policing, terrorism, covert investigations, police methods

Suggested Citation

Ross, Jacqueline E., Tradeoffs in Undercover Investigations: A Comparative Perspective. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=334763

Jacqueline E. Ross (Contact Author)

University of Illinois College of Law ( email )

504 E. Pennsylvania Avenue
Champaign, IL 61820
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
1,289
PlumX Metrics