The Case for Reinvigorating the Paperwork Reduction Act

38 Pages Posted: 5 Apr 2019

See all articles by Stuart Shapiro

Stuart Shapiro

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey - Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy

Date Written: March 13, 2019

Abstract

The Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) has not been modified since 1995. In that time, the burden of providing information to the government as required by law, and government-mandated recordkeeping, has continually increased. Paperwork requirements can have deleterious impacts on businesses, universities, and individuals trying to secure government benefits to which they are legally entitled. Although the PRA seeks to reduce these burdens, it itself sets up a bureaucratically cumbersome process that likely deters useful small-scale information collections. This article makes the case for reinvigorating the PRA. A reboot of the PRA should contain three elements: a mechanism for better understanding the impact of paperwork, including the cumulative burden; a revised system that allows greater scrutiny of more burdensome and important information collection requirements and less time spent on more routine ones; and additional flexibility for agencies seeking to comply with the PRA and for the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs seeking to enforce it.

Keywords: Paperwork, Regulation, Bureaucracy, Paperwork Reduction Act

JEL Classification: H83, K23, K32

Suggested Citation

Shapiro, Stuart, The Case for Reinvigorating the Paperwork Reduction Act (March 13, 2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3351953 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3351953

Stuart Shapiro (Contact Author)

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey - Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy ( email )

New Brunswick, NJ 08901
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
101
Abstract Views
975
Rank
476,054
PlumX Metrics