Accrual and Real Earnings Management and the Reputation of Nominated Advisors Around IPOs: The Experience of the UK Alternative Investment Market

Posted: 15 Apr 2019 Last revised: 27 Mar 2020

Date Written: March 19, 2019

Abstract

This paper investigates whether the reputation of the Nominated Advisor (Nomad) impacts accrual and real earnings management of Initial Public Offering (IPO) firms on the Alternative Investment Market (AIM) of the London Stock Exchange in the UK. While role of Nomads on AIM market is a significant determinant to ensure to the integrity of the financial reporting quality of their advisee firms, to date, there has been no analysis of the impact of Nomads on such reporting activities. This paper finds evidence that more reputable Nomads on the AIM market play a significant role to constrain the use of accrual-based and real-based earnings management during the IPO year by their advisee IPO firms. This evidence is robust, controlling for endogeneity and selection issue. In addition, the results show that IPO firms with more reputable Nomads experience a better long-run stock return performance and a lower failure rate in the following periods.

Keywords: Nominated Advisors, Earnings management, Initial Public Offerings, Long-run performance, IPO failure, Alternative Investment Market (AIM)

JEL Classification: G1, G2, G11, G14, G28, M41

Suggested Citation

Alhadab, Mohammad, Accrual and Real Earnings Management and the Reputation of Nominated Advisors Around IPOs: The Experience of the UK Alternative Investment Market (March 19, 2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3355941 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3355941

Mohammad Alhadab (Contact Author)

Al al-Bayt University ( email )

Faculty of Finance and Business Administration
Department of Accounting
Mafraq, 25113
Jordan
00962796811823 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
909
PlumX Metrics