Legitimate Authority and Just War

Providence: A Journal of Christianity & American Foreign Policy, No. 11, pp. 60-66 (Spring-Summer 2018)

9 Pages Posted: 7 May 2019

See all articles by Joshua J. Craddock

Joshua J. Craddock

Harvard University, Law School, Students ; James Wilson Institute for Natural Rights and the American Founding

Date Written: July 2, 2018

Abstract

Recent just war theory discussions have emphasized the just cause and right intention prongs of jus ad bellum, but have offered only cursory analysis of the legitimate authority prong in the American context. This article argues that legitimate authority depends in part on domestic law and that the sovereign's war powers must be exercised in accordance with the rule of law. In the American context, where sovereignty is divided, the Constitution's allocation of war powers should guide analysis. The article provides a survey of executive and congressional powers over war and hostilities, and then applies those legal rules to conflicts in Libya, Syria, and North Korea.

Keywords: just war theory, just war, Libya, Syria, North Korea, legitimate authority, war powers resolution, war power, constitution, armed conflict, military intervention, jus ad bellum

Suggested Citation

Craddock, Joshua J. and Craddock, Joshua J., Legitimate Authority and Just War (July 2, 2018). Providence: A Journal of Christianity & American Foreign Policy, No. 11, pp. 60-66 (Spring-Summer 2018), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3364631

Joshua J. Craddock (Contact Author)

James Wilson Institute for Natural Rights and the American Founding

722 13th St. NW
Fourth Floor
Washington, DC District of Columbia 20005
United States

HOME PAGE: http://jameswilsoninstitute.org/

Harvard University, Law School, Students ( email )

1563 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
59
Abstract Views
479
Rank
648,431
PlumX Metrics