The Compensation Hypothesis Revisited and Reversed

10 Pages Posted: 16 May 2019

See all articles by Andreas Bergh

Andreas Bergh

Lund University - Department of Economics; Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN)

Date Written: April 16, 2019

Abstract

This note describes how research on the link between globalization and openness has changed over time. Early contributions assumed that countries develop welfare states to compensate for volatility caused by economic openness (the compensation hypothesis).

Recent findings have cast doubts on several steps in the causal chain implied by the compensation hypothesis. In many ways, economic openness has been shown to be particularly beneficial for countries with high taxes and high income equality. Countries with large welfare states can use economic openness to mitigate some of the unintended side-effects of social protection and high taxes. The compensation hypothesis can thus be reformulated: Through trade, the citizens in large welfare states can enjoy some of the benefits associated with cheap labor and high wage dispersion despite their domestic economy being characterized by the opposite.

Keywords: Economic integration, Welfare state, Globalization

JEL Classification: F10, H53, E02

Suggested Citation

Bergh, Andreas and Bergh, Andreas, The Compensation Hypothesis Revisited and Reversed (April 16, 2019). IFN Working Paper No. 1273 (2019), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3373307

Andreas Bergh (Contact Author)

Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN) ( email )

Box 55665
Grevgatan 34 2nd floor
Stockholm, SE-102 15
Sweden
0707790734 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.ifn.se/web/AndreasB

Lund University - Department of Economics ( email )

P.O. Box 7082
S-220 07
Lund
Sweden

HOME PAGE: http://www.nek.lu.se/

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
35
Abstract Views
486
PlumX Metrics