Search Engines and Global Takedown Orders: Google v Equustek and the Future of Free Speech Online

Robert Diab, "Search Engines and Global Takedown Orders: Google v Equustek and the Future of Free Speech Online" (2019) 56 Osgoode Hall Law Journal, Forthcoming

42 Pages Posted: 10 Jun 2019

See all articles by Robert Diab

Robert Diab

Thompson Rivers University - Faculty of Law

Date Written: May 23, 2019

Abstract

The Supreme Court’s decision in Google v Equustek (2017) to uphold a global content take-down order remains controversial and consequential to wider debates about governing the internet. This paper examines the Court’s underlying assumption – a common view in take-down jurisprudence – that where a portal directs a critical mass of users to a harmful site, it facilitates harm and no longer engages in valuable speech. This ran contrary to the Court’s more considered view of links in Crookes v Newton (2011) as a form of mere reference and valuable per se for enabling the net as a public forum. This paper argues the Court should have applied its theory from Crookes to search engine links as no different in principle from others, while conceding that, at scale, links that merely refer can facilitate harm. Drawing on the Copyright Act and the Manila Principles on Intermediary Liability, the paper proposes a test for take-down orders that strikes a better balance between free speech and private interests.

Keywords: Google, Equustek, Content Takedown, Free Speech, Internet Regulation, Global Order

Suggested Citation

Diab, Robert, Search Engines and Global Takedown Orders: Google v Equustek and the Future of Free Speech Online (May 23, 2019). Robert Diab, "Search Engines and Global Takedown Orders: Google v Equustek and the Future of Free Speech Online" (2019) 56 Osgoode Hall Law Journal, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3393171 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3393171

Robert Diab (Contact Author)

Thompson Rivers University - Faculty of Law ( email )

900 McGill Road
Kamloops, British Columbia
Canada

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
152
Abstract Views
828
Rank
349,069
PlumX Metrics