Boolean Representations of Preferences under Ambiguity

41 Pages Posted: 23 Jul 2019

See all articles by Mira Frick

Mira Frick

Yale University - Cowles Foundation

Ryota Iijima

Yale University - Cowles Foundation

Yves Le Yaouanq

Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU)

Date Written: July 19, 2019

Abstract

We propose a class of multiple-prior representations of preferences under ambiguity where the belief the decision-maker (DM) uses to evaluate an uncertain prospect is the outcome of a game played by two conflicting forces, Pessimism and Optimism. The model does not restrict the sign of the DM’s ambiguity attitude, and we show that it provides a unified framework through which to characterize different degrees of ambiguity aversion, as well as to represent context-dependent negative and positive ambiguity attitudes documented in experiments. We prove that our baseline representation, Boolean expected utility (BEU), yields a novel representation of the class of invariant biseparable preferences (Ghirardato, Maccheroni, and Marinacci, 2004), which drops uncertainty aversion from maxmin expected utility (Gilboa and Schmeidler, 1989), while extensions of BEU allow for more general departures from independence.

Keywords: Ambiguity, Multiple priors, Dual-self models

JEL Classification: D81

Suggested Citation

Frick, Mira and Iijima, Ryota and Le Yaouanq, Yves, Boolean Representations of Preferences under Ambiguity (July 19, 2019). Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper No. 2180R, July 2019, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3423802 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3423802

Mira Frick (Contact Author)

Yale University - Cowles Foundation ( email )

Box 208281
New Haven, CT 06520-8281
United States

Ryota Iijima

Yale University - Cowles Foundation ( email )

Box 208281
New Haven, CT 06520-8281
United States

Yves Le Yaouanq

Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU) ( email )

Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1
Munich, DE Bavaria 80539
Germany

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
57
Abstract Views
510
Rank
664,522
PlumX Metrics