Using Objective Words in the Reviews to Improve the Colloquial Arabic Sentiment Analysis

International Journal on Natural Language Computing (IJNLC) Vol. 6, No.3, June 2017

14 Pages Posted: 10 Aug 2019

See all articles by Omar Al-Harbi

Omar Al-Harbi

Jazan University - Department of Computer and Information

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: AugustJine 2017

Abstract

One of the main difficulties in sentiment analysis of the Arabic language is the presence of the colloquialism. In this paper, we examine the effect of using objective words in conjunction with sentimental words on sentiment classification for the colloquial Arabic reviews, specifically Jordanian colloquial reviews. The reviews often include both sentimental and objective words; however, the most existing sentiment analysis models ignore the objective words as they are considered useless. In this work, we created two lexicons: the first includes the colloquial sentimental words and compound phrases, while the other contains the objective words associated with values of sentiment tendency based on a particular estimation method. We used these lexicons to extract sentiment features that would be training input to the Support Vector Machines (SVM) to classify the sentiment polarity of the reviews. The reviews dataset have been collected manually from JEERAN website. The results of the experiments show that the proposed approach improves the polarity classification in comparison to two baseline models, with accuracy 95.6%.

Keywords: Arabic sentiment analysis, opinion mining, colloquial Arabic language, colloquial Jordanian reviews

Suggested Citation

Al-Harbi, Omar, Using Objective Words in the Reviews to Improve the Colloquial Arabic Sentiment Analysis (AugustJine 2017). International Journal on Natural Language Computing (IJNLC) Vol. 6, No.3, June 2017 , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3433579

Omar Al-Harbi (Contact Author)

Jazan University - Department of Computer and Information

Saudi Arabia

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
12
Abstract Views
176
PlumX Metrics