Autonomous Weapons and the Laws of Targeting: Mapping Use-Cases to Identify Operational Constraints

Posted: 3 Sep 2019 Last revised: 6 Apr 2021

See all articles by Arthur PB Laudrain

Arthur PB Laudrain

University of Oxford; Rotary Foundation

Date Written: August 27, 2019

Abstract

This paper aims at studying constraints posed on autonomous weapon systems (AWS) by their tasks and environments. We find use-dependent functions need stronger standardisation, while design-related ones require significant technical safeguards. We then introduce a categorisation of the weapons’ use-case. We find the added-value of AWS rests in defensive missions, either for access denial or last-resort self-defence. Other scenarios, excepted strategic strikes, present significant drawbacks. We conclude a reactive model of autonomy seems a more realistic realisation of AWS than the fully autonomous system most feared by some. This is significant because it may comply with requirements of meaningful human control and military operational control.

Keywords: autonomous weapons, humanitarian law, meaningful human control, humanity, distinction, proportionality

Suggested Citation

Laudrain, Arthur PB, Autonomous Weapons and the Laws of Targeting: Mapping Use-Cases to Identify Operational Constraints (August 27, 2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3443636 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3443636

Arthur PB Laudrain (Contact Author)

University of Oxford ( email )

Mansfield Road
Oxford, Oxfordshire OX1 4AU
United Kingdom

HOME PAGE: http://apb-ldn.org

Rotary Foundation ( email )

One Rotary Center
1560 Sherman Ave.
Evanston, IL 60201
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
571
PlumX Metrics