Charting the Trajectory of Intensity of Review Following Osborne v Worksafe New Zealand

35 Pages Posted: 8 Sep 2019 Last revised: 18 Sep 2019

See all articles by Siobhan Davies

Siobhan Davies

Victoria University of Wellington, Faculty of Law, Student/Alumni

Date Written: 2018

Abstract

The courts have used the concepts of justiciability and intensity of review to restrict access to judicial review where it seemed inappropriate to intervene in executive decision-making. The courts have used these concepts to limit judicial review of prosecution discretion. More recently, there has been a trend in favour of widening availability of review, resulting in a shift away from non-justiciability towards intensity of review. This paper examines the trajectory of judicial review away from non-justiciability and towards intensity of review, and considers whether the Osborne v Worksafe New Zealand litigation disrupts or endorses this trajectory. Overall, it argues that the Court of Appeal endorsed the shift to intensity of review. While the Supreme Court appears to disapprove of intensity of review, particularly low intensity of review, it did not overturn the Court of Appeal’s position. In the context of judicial review of prosecution decisions, lower courts will apply the Court of Appeal’s precedent, and use a varying intensity approach.

Keywords: intensity of review, judicial review, justiciability, Osborne v Worksafe New Zealand, prosecution discretion

JEL Classification: K00

Suggested Citation

Davies, Siobhan, Charting the Trajectory of Intensity of Review Following Osborne v Worksafe New Zealand (2018). Victoria University of Wellington Legal Research Paper, Student/Alumni Paper No. 15/2019, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3449045 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3449045

Siobhan Davies (Contact Author)

Victoria University of Wellington, Faculty of Law, Student/Alumni ( email )

PO Box 600
Wellington, Victoria 6140
New Zealand

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
48
Abstract Views
347
PlumX Metrics