The Pernicious Problem of Platform Enabled Voter Intimidation

4 Georgetown Law Technology Review (2020 Forthcoming)

47 Pages Posted: 4 Dec 2019

See all articles by Chris Conrad

Chris Conrad

Georgetown University, Law Center, Students

Date Written: May 12, 2019

Abstract

Individuals and political organizations are increasingly taking to internet platforms to intimidate voters. This Note outlines the ways that these platforms operate to facilitate suppression of suffrage. It also surveys the landscape of federal statutory schemes available to victims of voter intimidation. It reaches the unsettling conclusion that none of these legal instruments are adequate to deter rampant online campaigns to alter voting behavior. In search of viable alternatives, it examines several institutional and legal models that may address the failures of existing federal civil statutes. It ultimately settles on the view that only greater public-private coordination between federal regulators and large platforms will thwart the pernicious problem of platform-enabled voter intimidation.

Keywords: Platforms, Internet Platforms, Voter Intimidation, Voter Manipulation, Voter Misinformation

Suggested Citation

Conrad, Chris, The Pernicious Problem of Platform Enabled Voter Intimidation (May 12, 2019). 4 Georgetown Law Technology Review (2020 Forthcoming), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3452635

Chris Conrad (Contact Author)

Georgetown University, Law Center, Students ( email )

Washington, DC
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
55
Abstract Views
267
Rank
675,679
PlumX Metrics