Allocation of Nonprofit Funds Among Program, Fundraising, and Administration

48 Pages Posted: 30 Sep 2019 Last revised: 8 May 2023

See all articles by Telesilla Kotsi

Telesilla Kotsi

The Ohio State University, Fisher College of Business, Department of Operations and Business Analytics

Arian Aflaki

University of Pittsburgh - Katz Graduate School of Business

Goker Aydin

Johns Hopkins University - Carey Business School

Alfonso Pedraza Martinez

Indiana University - Kelley School of Business - Department of Operation & Decision Technologies

Date Written: May 5, 2023

Abstract

Problem Definition: US nonprofits declare three types of expenses in their IRS 990 forms: program spending to meet their beneficiaries' needs; fundraising spending to raise donations; administration spending to build and maintain capacity. Charity watchdogs expect nonprofits to prioritize program over other expenses. We study when such expectations may be counterproductive.

Methodology / Results: We characterize the optimal budget allocations to program, fundraising, and administration using a two-period model, which also includes the nonprofit’s capacity, return on program (the net value of program to beneficiaries) and uncertain future needs of beneficiaries. The optimal allocation depends on the nonprofit's capacity. At high capacity, the nonprofit should spend on administration just enough to maintain its existing capacity. At moderate capacity, the nonprofit should still just maintain its existing capacity, but also limit its program spending, so that it has money to fundraise a budget that will use up its capacity. At low capacity, the nonprofit should increase administration spending to expand its future capacity. We use public data to compare our model’s prescriptions with the actual budget allocations of a leading network of foodbanks.

Managerial Implications: Our case study indicates that the foodbank network underspends on administration and fundraising, which triggers a phenomenon known in the nonprofit sector as the starvation cycle. We conduct a sensitivity analysis focused on the return on program. At higher values of return, the gap between actual and prescribed allocations shrinks. Perhaps this indicates that the nonprofit's allocations are based on high estimates of return. An important implication is that, when setting expectations for a nonprofit, watchdogs should be mindful of the nonprofit's capacity and return on program.

Keywords: nonprofit operations, capacity, program, fundraising, and administration spending

Suggested Citation

Kotsi, Telesilla O. and Aflaki, Arian and Aydin, Goker and Pedraza Martinez, Alfonso, Allocation of Nonprofit Funds Among Program, Fundraising, and Administration (May 5, 2023). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3460795 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3460795

Telesilla O. Kotsi (Contact Author)

The Ohio State University, Fisher College of Business, Department of Operations and Business Analytics ( email )

2100 Neil Ave, Columbus
Columbus, OH 43210
United States

HOME PAGE: http://https://fisher.osu.edu/people/kotsi.1

Arian Aflaki

University of Pittsburgh - Katz Graduate School of Business ( email )

Pittsburgh, PA 15260
United States

Goker Aydin

Johns Hopkins University - Carey Business School ( email )

100 International Drive
Baltimore, MD 21202
United States

Alfonso Pedraza Martinez

Indiana University - Kelley School of Business - Department of Operation & Decision Technologies ( email )

Business 670
1309 E. Tenth Street
Bloomington, IN 47401
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
364
Abstract Views
1,521
Rank
151,600
PlumX Metrics