Firearms Chimera: The Counter Productive Campaign to Ban the AR-15 Rifle
36 Pages Posted: 18 Oct 2019 Last revised: 16 Nov 2020
Date Written: October 8, 2019
Abstract
This paper examines claims about military-style semi-automatic rifles like the AR-15, such as the belief that pistol grips and hand guards facilitate mass murder by enabling shoots to spray fire from the hip; that certain features are useful in combat and crime but not in sporting applications; and whether such firearms are “commonly used” for lawful purposes. Examining the history of civilian and military firearms design; U.S. Army marksmanship doctrine; military doctrine respecting infantry combat; prior research on topics including the impact of magazine capacity on casualty rates in gun crime, the efficacy of various calibers of ammunition in the self-defense; and other topics, this paper concludes that the AR-15 is not a military weapon; that it is useful for and used in all legitimate civilian shooting applications; that it is not deadlier than other firearms in criminal assaults including mass public shootings; and the misleading claims about the AR-15 by control advocates undermine efforts to develop effective proposals to reduce gun violence.
Keywords: Second Amendment, firearms, AR-15, Assault Weapons
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation