Intergenerational Altruism and Social Welfare: a Critique of the Dynastic Model
29 Pages Posted: 19 Jul 2004
Date Written: June 1987
Abstract
In this paper, I show that, under relatively weak conditions, dynastic equilibria are never welfare optima. If a social planner sets policy to maximize a social welfare function, then, except in extreme cases where the planner cares only about a single generation, successive generations will never be linked through altruistically motivated transfers. This suggests that the dynastic model is unsuitable for normative analysis, and, to the extent governments actually behave in this manner, the model is also inappropriate for positive analysis. In addition, I show that, except in a few special cases, the planner's preferences are dynamically inconsistent. If the planner can successfully resolve this inconsistency, then the central result is somewhat modified.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Preference Heterogeneity and Optimal Capital Income Taxation
By Mikhail Golosov, Maxim Troshkin, ...
-
Optimal Taxation of Entrepreneurial Capital with Private Information
-
Optimal Taxation of Entrepreneurial Capital with Private Information
-
Designing Optimal Disability Insurance: A Case for Asset Testing
By Mikhail Golosov and Aleh Tsyvinski
-
Optimal Taxation with Endogenous Insurance Markets
By Mikhail Golosov and Aleh Tsyvinski
-
Inequality, Social Discounting, and Estate Taxation
By Emmanuel Farhi and Iván Werning
-
Inequality, Social Discounting and Estate Taxation
By Emmanuel Farhi and Iván Werning
-
Dynamic Mechanism Design with Hidden Income and Hidden Actions: Technical Appendix
-
Dynamic Contracting with Persistent Shocks
By Yuzhe Zhang