Personalized Choice of Private Law

54 Pages Posted: 27 Nov 2019 Last revised: 11 Aug 2021

See all articles by Matthew Seligman

Matthew Seligman

Constitutional Law Center, Stanford Law School; Yale Law School

Date Written: February 26, 2020

Abstract

Personalized choice of private law is a novel framework for designing the legal rules that govern transactions and interactions between private parties. It addresses a pervasive theoretical and practical problem in private law: Private ordering is supposed to enable parties to choose the terms of their transactions, but under modern commercial conditions, many people do not actually consent to important terms of their contracts and other interactions with firms. Personalized choice of private law responds to that failure by empowering individuals to choose, from a government- authored, centralized catalogue of options, the private law rule that will apply to them. Through that choice, it grants people a greater say in crafting their transactions and interactions with powerful private parties who would otherwise dictate the terms of engagement.

This Article offers a synoptic view of personalized choice of private law, addressing questions of scope, design, and justification. It first situates the framework within the theoretical and doctrinal landscape of existing approaches to private law and analyzes important scope and design choices facing lawmakers in its implementation. It then offers twin justifications grounded in foundational norms of private law: autonomy and economic efficiency. It proceeds to consider how the framework should be crafted to account for concerns about the unequal distribution or the improper commodification of legal rights and rules that personalization might entail.

The Article concludes by offering a proof of concept of personalized choice of private law by sketching its implementation in two contexts: arbitration and data privacy. A Do Not Arbitrate List could render arbitration clauses unenforceable against you. A Digital Data Privacy Registry could empower you to choose a legal rule that prohibits any company from collecting, using, or selling data about you. These two potential implementations of personalized choice of private law illustrate its promise as a new tool for the design of private law.

Keywords: Private Law; Contract Law; Behavioral Law and Economics; Arbitration; Privacy Law; Consumer Law; Legal Theory; Law and Economics; Law and Philosophy

Suggested Citation

Seligman, Matthew, Personalized Choice of Private Law (February 26, 2020). Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 596, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3493093 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3493093

Matthew Seligman (Contact Author)

Constitutional Law Center, Stanford Law School ( email )

559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305
United States

Yale Law School ( email )

127 Wall Street
New Haven, CT 06510
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
199
Abstract Views
1,461
Rank
278,340
PlumX Metrics