Download This Paper
Preprints with The Lancet is part of SSRN´s First Look, a place where journals identify content of interest prior to publication. Authors have opted in at submission to The Lancet family of journals to post their preprints on Preprints with The Lancet. The usual SSRN checks and a Lancet-specific check for appropriateness and transparency have been applied. Preprints available here are not Lancet publications or necessarily under review with a Lancet journal. These preprints are early stage research papers that have not been peer-reviewed. The findings should not be used for clinical or public health decision making and should not be presented to a lay audience without highlighting that they are preliminary and have not been peer-reviewed. For more information on this collaboration, see the comments published in The Lancet about the trial period, and our decision to make this a permanent offering, or visit The Lancet´s FAQ page, and for any feedback please contact preprints@lancet.com.
Smokers’ Awareness of Filter Ventilation, and How They Believe it Affects Them: Findings from the ITC Four Country Survey
21 Pages Posted: 16 Apr 2020
More...Abstract
Background: Filter ventilation creates impressions of ‘lightness’ and controls machine-tested yields of tar and nicotine. Virtually all factory made cigarettes now have filter ventilation in Australia, Canada, the UK and the US. Previous research, conducted before ‘light’ and ‘mild’ labelling was banned, found low awareness of filter ventilation. This study explores current levels of awareness and understandings.
Methods: We used data from the 2018 wave of the ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey with samples from USA, England, Canada and Australia. Analyses were conducted initially on a weighted sample of 11,844, and subsequently on 7,541 daily factory made cigarette (FMC) smokers.
Findings: Only 38.5% of all respondents reported being aware of filter ventilation. Among daily FMC smokers, only 9.4% believed their cigarettes had filter ventilation. Respondents who believed their usual cigarettes had filter ventilation were more likely to believe their usual cigarettes were both less harmful (18.2% vs 8.8%, p<.001) and smoother (11.8% vs 7.3%, p<.001), when compared with other daily FMC smokers.
Interpretation: Awareness of filter ventilation remains low in all four countries and few smokers realize their cigarettes almost certainly have it. Smokers who believed their cigarettes have filter ventilation were more likely to believe their cigarettes were both smoother and less harmful, so if anything exacerbates rather than attenuates the intuition that smoother cigarettes are less harmful. Filter ventilation is inherently misleading to smokers.
Funding: National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (APP1106451), US National Cancer Institute (P01CA200512), and Canadian Institutes of Health Research (FDN-148477).
Ethical Approval: The survey was approved by Institutional Review Board, Medical University of South Carolina; Research Ethics Office, King’s College London, UK; Office of Research Ethics, University of Waterloo, Canada; and Human Research Ethics, Cancer Council Victoria, Australia. All participants provided consent to participate.
Declaration of Interest: GTF has served as an expert witness on behalf of governments in litigation involving the tobacco industry. KMC has been a consultant and received grant funding from the Pfizer Inc. in the past 5 years. K.M.C has also been a paid expert witness in litigation against the tobacco industry. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Keywords: tobacco products, cigarette design, risk perception, smoking cessation
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation