Who’s Responsible Here? Establishing Legal Responsibility in the Fissured Workplace

53 Pages Posted: 2 Apr 2020 Last revised: 14 Aug 2020

See all articles by Tanya Goldman

Tanya Goldman

affiliation not provided to SSRN

David Weil

Brandeis University - The Heller School for Social Policy and Management; Harvard Kennedy School Ash Institute for Democracy

Date Written: February 18, 2020

Abstract

The nature of work is changing, with workers enduring increasingly precarious working conditions without any safety net. In response, this Article proposes a new “Concentric Circle framework” which would improve workers’ access to civil, labor, and employment rights. Many businesses, including app-based platforms, have restructured toward “fissured workplace” business models. They treat workers like employees (specifying behaviors and closely monitoring outcomes) but they classify workers as independent contractors (engaging them at an arms-length and cutting them off from rights and benefits tied to employment). These arrangements confound legal classifications of “employment” and expose deficiencies with existing workplace protections, which are based on “employment relationships.” As a result, a growing number of workers lack both bargaining power and critical workplace rights and benefits. We propose a Concentric Circle framework to better govern workers’ rights in the modern era. At the core, we maintain that certain rights and protections should not be tethered to an employment relationship, but to work itself. Thus, the right to be compensated for work and paid a minimum wage; freedom from discrimination and retaliation; access to a safe working environment, and the right to associate and engage in concerted activity should belong to all workers, not just employees. Second, as a middle circle, we argue for a rebuttable presumption of employment to address those rights that remain exclusive to employees (and not independent contractors), and we propose an updated legal test of employment. Finally, at the outer ring of the framework, we suggest policies that could enhance workers’ access to benefits that promote worker mobility and social welfare. Other scholarship has focused exclusively on either independent contractors or employees, or it has proposed a new category of worker altogether. We contend that this comprehensive framework better assigns rights, responsibilities, and protections in the modern workplace than do current legal doctrines or alternative proposals.

Keywords: Employment, independent contractor; employee classification; fissured workplace

JEL Classification: J8, J38, J58, J78

Suggested Citation

Goldman, Tanya and Weil, David, Who’s Responsible Here? Establishing Legal Responsibility in the Fissured Workplace (February 18, 2020). Institute for New Economic Thinking Working Paper Series No. 114
https://doi.org/10.36687/inetwp114 , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3551446

Tanya Goldman

affiliation not provided to SSRN

David Weil (Contact Author)

Brandeis University - The Heller School for Social Policy and Management ( email )

P.O. Box 549110/MS 035
415 South Street
Waltham, MA 02454
United States

Harvard Kennedy School Ash Institute for Democracy ( email )

79 John F. Kennedy Street
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
467
Abstract Views
2,117
Rank
113,889
PlumX Metrics