The Conflicting Jurisprudence Behind the Laws on Abortion

21 Pages Posted: 14 Apr 2020 Last revised: 14 Dec 2020

See all articles by Ravi Singh Chhikara

Ravi Singh Chhikara

University of Delhi, Campus Law Centre

Date Written: March 24, 2020

Abstract

The abortion involves the most intimate and personal choices a person may make in a lifetime, choices central to personal dignity and autonomy. Protecting access to abortion effectuates vital constitutional values, including dignity, autonomy, equality, and bodily integrity. This is something central to a woman's life, to her dignity. It's a decision she must make for herself. And when the government controls that decision for her, she's being treated as less than a fully adult human responsible for her own choices. Without the right of reproductive choice, women cannot participate equally in the nation's social, political and economic life. Their freedom to decide whether and when to have children opens doors that would otherwise be closed. Through this paper, we have tried to address how various arguments of pro-life supporters are wrong and how the arguments of pro-choice supporters are in accordance with the human conscience.

Keywords: Abortion, personal dignity, autonomy, reproductive rights

Suggested Citation

Singh Chhikara, Ravi, The Conflicting Jurisprudence Behind the Laws on Abortion (March 24, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3560034 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3560034

Ravi Singh Chhikara (Contact Author)

University of Delhi, Campus Law Centre ( email )

India
7042131601 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://clc.du.ac.in

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
608
Abstract Views
1,624
Rank
82,272
PlumX Metrics