Forensic Source Conclusions: Twenty Threats to Validity

Forensic source conclusions: Twenty threats to validity. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, Forthcoming

42 Pages Posted: 21 May 2020

Date Written: April 2020

Abstract

Forensic science evidence may be the most powerful weapon in the arsenal of law enforcement officials and prosecutors. As such, it is important to be aware of factors that threaten the validity of forensic source conclusions (e.g., “This bullet was fired from that gun”). This paper identifies 20 threats to the validity of forensic source conclusions including threats that spring from:

(a) the evidentiary samples themselves,

(b) forensic examiners and the procedures they use,

(c) features of the law, and

(d) cognitive limitations of jurors and others who must weigh forensic science source claims.

Keywords: Bias, Error Rate, Forensic Science, Testing, Validity

Suggested Citation

Koehler, Jonathan J., Forensic Source Conclusions: Twenty Threats to Validity (April 2020). Forensic source conclusions: Twenty threats to validity. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3587249 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3587249

Jonathan J. Koehler (Contact Author)

Northwestern University - Pritzker School of Law ( email )

375 E. Chicago Ave
Chicago, IL 60611
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
140
Abstract Views
780
Rank
375,766
PlumX Metrics