Cross-Region Transfers in a Monetary Union: Evidence from the US and Some Implications

44 Pages Posted: 14 May 2020

Date Written: May 12, 2020

Abstract

US federal transfers to individuals are large, countercyclical, vary geographically, and are often credited for helping stabilize regional economies. This paper estimates the short-run effects of these transfers using plausibly exogenous regional variation in temporary stimulus packages and earlier permanent Social Security increases. States that received larger transfers tended to grow faster contemporaneously, with a multiplier of around 1.5 for permanent transfers and 1/3 for temporary transfers. Results are broadly consistent with an open-economy New Keynesian model. At business-cycle frequencies, cross-region transfer multipliers are not large, suggesting only modest gains in regional stabilization from US federal automatic stabilizers.

Keywords: Plastics & Rubber Industry, Common Carriers Industry, Construction Industry, Business Cycles and Stabilization Policies, Food & Beverage Industry, Pulp & Paper Industry, General Manufacturing, Textiles, Apparel & Leather Industry, Economic Growth, Economic Theory & Research, Industrial Economics, Employment and Shared Growth, Wages, Compensation & Benefits

Suggested Citation

Pennings, Steven Michael, Cross-Region Transfers in a Monetary Union: Evidence from the US and Some Implications (May 12, 2020). World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 9244, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3599574

Steven Michael Pennings (Contact Author)

World Bank ( email )

1818 H Street, NW
Washington, DC 20433
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
33
Abstract Views
221
PlumX Metrics