Innocent or Inconclusive? Analyzing Abolitionists’ Claims About the Death Penalty
Innocent or Inconclusive: Analyzing Abolitionists’ Claims About the Death Penalty, NEB. L. REV.: BULL. (September 4, 2018).
7 Pages Posted: 15 Jun 2020
Date Written: September 4, 2018
Abstract
This is a brief analysis of the death penalty innocence issue, using the July 2018 book The Death Penalty (part of the Concepts and Insights Series) as a reference point.
Keywords: Death penalty, False confessions, Falsely convicted, Actual innocence, Michael Radelet, Brandon L. Garrett, Lee Kovarsky, Ernest Dobbert, Cameron Todd Willingham, Factual innocence, Kansas v. Marsh, Criminal justice reform, Execute innocent person,
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Conklin, Michael, Innocent or Inconclusive? Analyzing Abolitionists’ Claims About the Death Penalty (September 4, 2018). Innocent or Inconclusive: Analyzing Abolitionists’ Claims About the Death Penalty, NEB. L. REV.: BULL. (September 4, 2018)., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3606339
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.