Innocent or Inconclusive? Analyzing Abolitionists’ Claims About the Death Penalty

Innocent or Inconclusive: Analyzing Abolitionists’ Claims About the Death Penalty, NEB. L. REV.: BULL. (September 4, 2018).

7 Pages Posted: 15 Jun 2020

See all articles by Michael Conklin

Michael Conklin

Angelo State University - Business Law; Texas A&M University School of Law

Date Written: September 4, 2018

Abstract

This is a brief analysis of the death penalty innocence issue, using the July 2018 book The Death Penalty (part of the Concepts and Insights Series) as a reference point.

Keywords: Death penalty, False confessions, Falsely convicted, Actual innocence, Michael Radelet, Brandon L. Garrett, Lee Kovarsky, Ernest Dobbert, Cameron Todd Willingham, Factual innocence, Kansas v. Marsh, Criminal justice reform, Execute innocent person,

Suggested Citation

Conklin, Michael, Innocent or Inconclusive? Analyzing Abolitionists’ Claims About the Death Penalty (September 4, 2018). Innocent or Inconclusive: Analyzing Abolitionists’ Claims About the Death Penalty, NEB. L. REV.: BULL. (September 4, 2018)., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3606339

Michael Conklin (Contact Author)

Angelo State University - Business Law ( email )

United States

Texas A&M University School of Law ( email )

Tarrant County
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
315
Abstract Views
401
Rank
175,540
PlumX Metrics