'Paid Surrogacy Abroad Does Not Violate Public Policy: UK Supreme Court'
Intermational Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics 2020; 150: 129–133
8 Pages Posted: 7 Jul 2020 Last revised: 24 Nov 2020
Date Written: 2020
Abstract
In April 2020, the United Kingdom Supreme Court upheld compensation for a woman whose negligent medical care had left her dependent on surrogate motherhood (SM) to have a family, even though SM might be by lawful commercial services in California, USA. Paid SM is criminal in the UK. Altruistic SM arrangements are legal, but unenforceable. The trial judge felt bound by precedent to disallow compensation for lawful commercial SM abroad, as contrary to public policy. The Court of Appeal reversed this ruling, since public policy is not immutable, and had changed. The Supreme Court agreed, acknowledging an evolution in popular attitudes concerning what a family is, and how it might be formed. Government policy was observed to accommodate SM in suitable cases. Movement was perceived towards legislative reform, and judicial recognition of paid SM arrangements abroad that are not exploitative or abusive of surrogates, commissioning parents, or resulting children was considered appropriate.
Keywords: Commercial surrogacy; Law reform; Public policy; Surrogate motherhood; UK law reform; UK Supreme Court; Whittington Hospital case
JEL Classification: I18, J13, I10, K10
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation