Reflections on the Trial of Vichy Collaborator Paul Touvier for Crimes against Humanity in France

32 Pages Posted: 19 Jun 2020 Last revised: 17 Sep 2020

See all articles by Leila N. Sadat

Leila N. Sadat

Washington University in St. Louis - School of Law; Yale Law School

Date Written: January 1, 1995

Abstract

This article traces the historical and legal background of France’s prosecution of Paul Touvier in the 1990s, concluding that Touvier’s conviction for crimes against humanity was legally and morally justified. Touvier’s victims and descendants were honored by his conviction, his decades-long evasion of the law was remedied, and the principles expounded at Nuremberg were resurrected and applied. The author is skeptical, however, about the application of the trial to broader questions about the action of the Vichy government. Indeed, this essay suggests that efforts to transform Touvier’s trial into an authoritative judgement on Vichy France resulted in inevitable disappointment.

Keywords: Crimes against humanity; international law; Paul Touvier; Vichy France; French law; criminal law; World War II; France; Nuremberg; public policy; French courts; post-war prosecution; history

Suggested Citation

Sadat, Leila N., Reflections on the Trial of Vichy Collaborator Paul Touvier for Crimes against Humanity in France (January 1, 1995). 20 Journal of Law and Social Inquiry 191 (1995), Washington University in St. Louis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 19-06-06, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3629829

Leila N. Sadat (Contact Author)

Washington University in St. Louis - School of Law ( email )

Campus Box 1120
St. Louis, MO 63130
United States
314-935-6411 (Phone)
314-935-5356 (Fax)

Yale Law School ( email )

127 Wall Street
New Haven, CT 06510
United States
3143042757 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
44
Abstract Views
348
PlumX Metrics