The Grounds of Arbitral Authority

42 Pages Posted: 22 Jul 2020 Last revised: 3 Nov 2022

Date Written: December 30, 2020

Abstract

The Supreme Court has repeatedly characterized arbitration as a “creature of contract,” and as the upshot of parties’ voluntary choices that the Court must honor. Based on this metaphor, the Court has expanded the scope of arbitration even in employment and consumer contracts, giving broad authority to arbitrators and limiting parties’ access to procedural mechanisms like class actions and judicial review. The metaphor does not fit the Court’s jurisprudence and its aggressive pro-arbitration policy, and rests on a mistaken view about the structure of contract law, ignoring that contract—and, therefore, arbitration—is a creature of law. The contractual view of arbitration also generates normative problems. It leads to a form of “everyday libertarianism,” which shields arbitration law from critical scrutiny, generates significant problems in mandatory arbitration in employment and consumer transactions, and even leads the Court’s critics to mistakenly assume that lack of consent is the cause of the problems in these contexts. As the Article argues, the mistaken notion of arbitration as a creature of contract is not limited to the domestic level—it also extends to international arbitration.

We thus need to replace the contractual metaphor. The Article offers a better account of the structure of arbitration, based on the notion that arbitration law, like contract law, is a compound rule generating both powers and duties. Based on this more accurate picture of arbitration law, the Article offers two criteria for the evaluating arbitration as a legal enforcement institution: its effectiveness as a device for producing law and its aptness as a rights enforcement mechanism. Ultimately, because arbitration requires the law’s assistance, law has the authority and the responsibility to ensure that arbitration works adequately. As every exercise of legal authority, arbitration stands in need of justification and should be subject to normative evaluation.

Keywords: Arbitration, Contract Theory, Federal Arbitration Act

Suggested Citation

Jiménez, Felipe, The Grounds of Arbitral Authority (December 30, 2020). Tulane Law Review, Vol. 96, 2022, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3657506 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3657506

Felipe Jiménez (Contact Author)

USC Gould School of Law ( email )

Los Angeles, CA 90089
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
294
Abstract Views
1,483
Rank
188,858
PlumX Metrics