Herein of 'Herein Granted': Why Article I's Vesting Clause Does Not Support the Doctrine of Enumerated Powers

Constitutional Commentary, Forthcoming

U of Michigan Public Law Research Paper No. 681

43 Pages Posted: 6 Oct 2020 Last revised: 8 Oct 2020

See all articles by Richard Primus

Richard Primus

University of Michigan Law School

Date Written: July 31, 2020

Abstract

Reasoning from the nonparallel wording of the Constitution’s three Vesting Clauses, scholars across the ideological spectrum read Article I, Section 1 to establish the principle that Congress may exercise only powers affirmatively enumerated in the text of the Constitution. This “enumerationist reading” of the Clause is deeply flawed and should be discarded. It fits the Clause’s text poorly. It is in tension with important facts about constitutional structure. Perhaps for those reasons, it is not a reading of the Clause that Americans recognized in the Constitution’s first years: in the First Congress, nobody read the Clause that way, despite ample incentives to do so. If the nonparallel phrasing of the three Vesting Clauses is to be given substantive significance, a better way to do it is to read Article I, Section 1 as a limit on where legislative powers are vested, not as a limit on what powers Congress may exercise. But that reading is not free of difficulties, either. The best way to understand the non-parallel phrasing is probably to regard it as an accident of the drafting process, one that carries no substantive significance in constitutional law. Close reading is an important interpretive method, but not every word choice in a document is substantive, even when that document is the Constitution.

Keywords: constitutional law, constitutional interpretation, federalism

Suggested Citation

Primus, Richard, Herein of 'Herein Granted': Why Article I's Vesting Clause Does Not Support the Doctrine of Enumerated Powers (July 31, 2020). Constitutional Commentary, Forthcoming, U of Michigan Public Law Research Paper No. 681, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3660227 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3660227

Richard Primus (Contact Author)

University of Michigan Law School ( email )

625 South State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215
United States
734-647-5543 (Phone)
734-764-8309 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
144
Abstract Views
1,160
Rank
364,703
PlumX Metrics