Designing a Personal Insolvency Regime: A Baseline Framework for India’s Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India, "The Evolving Insolvency and Bankruptcy Regime in India: A Narrative", Forthcoming

Tulane Public Law Research Paper 20-17

21 Pages Posted: 14 Sep 2020 Last revised: 2 Feb 2021

See all articles by Adam Feibelman

Adam Feibelman

Tulane University - Law School

Renuka Sane

Trustbridge Rule of Law Foundation; National Institute of Public Finance and Policy

Date Written: August 17, 2020

Abstract

In December 2019, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) notified provisions for insolvencies of personal guarantors to corporate debtors under that country’s Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, thereby putting those provisions into force. The IBBI has released regulations for cases involving guarantors and has indicated that it is moving toward notification of the provisions of the Code for other personal debtors. While the Code and regulations for personal guarantors set out a broad framework for the personal insolvency regime, it is still unclear whether there will be limits, requirements, or guidance for various aspects of repayment plans that debtors must propose in insolvency.

This article, forthcoming in the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India's publication, "The Evolving Insolvency and Bankruptcy Regime in India: A Narrative," proposes that repayment plans and other aspects of the insolvency process should be standardized enough to ensure a baseline treatment of both debtors and creditors, subject to some flexibility for unique or exceptional circumstances. While a generally negotiated process may be appropriate for commercial debtors under the Code, there are good reasons to believe that the process for personal debtors should be significantly more rule-bound. If the basic design of repayment plans can be specified, it might be best to dispense with the need for creditors to vote to approve plans, except perhaps to approve plans with more generous relief to debtors, and the Board or the adjudicating authorities might also adopt an approach to ‘fast-track’ debtors to bankruptcy who are unlikely to be able to repay any significant amount to creditors in insolvency.

Keywords: Consumer Bankruptcy, Personal Insolvency, India

Suggested Citation

Feibelman, Adam and Sane, Renuka, Designing a Personal Insolvency Regime: A Baseline Framework for India’s Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (August 17, 2020). Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India, "The Evolving Insolvency and Bankruptcy Regime in India: A Narrative", Forthcoming, Tulane Public Law Research Paper 20-17, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3675810 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3675810

Adam Feibelman (Contact Author)

Tulane University - Law School ( email )

6329 Freret Street
New Orleans, LA 70118
United States

Renuka Sane

Trustbridge Rule of Law Foundation ( email )

New Delhi
India

National Institute of Public Finance and Policy ( email )

18/2, Satsang Vihar Marg
New Delhi, 110067
India

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
162
Abstract Views
750
Rank
330,928
PlumX Metrics