Institutionalizing the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Independence

ConLawNow (Forthcoming)

UC Hastings Research Paper Forthcoming

17 Pages Posted: 28 Aug 2020 Last revised: 3 Feb 2021

Date Written: August 27, 2020

Abstract

The United States response to the COVID-19 pandemic was sub-optimal. One problem in it was the politicization of the public health response. One aspect of that politicization was aggressive political intervention in CDC efforts to provide guidance and help pandemic response. The concern was strong enough that four previous CDC Director, in an unusual step, published an op-ed calling out political intervention in CDC. This article proposes two changes to strengthen the CDC’s institutional independence: codifying the CDC’s role in preventing diseases and reducing harms in a statute, and restructuring the agency to be led by a multi-member Board appointed for long times and with removal protections (along the lines of the Board of the Federal Reserve System). These changes can send a strong message that expert advice in public health should be science-based and less, rather than more, political. It can also protect CDC’s long-standing independence, while preserving some political control.

Keywords: CDC; Appointment clause

JEL Classification: H11

Suggested Citation

Reiss, Dorit Rubinstein, Institutionalizing the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Independence (August 27, 2020). ConLawNow (Forthcoming), UC Hastings Research Paper Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3682044 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3682044

Dorit Rubinstein Reiss (Contact Author)

UC Law, San Francisco ( email )

200 McAllister Street
San Francisco, CA 94102
United States
415-5654844 (Phone)
415-5654865 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
64
Abstract Views
774
Rank
637,872
PlumX Metrics