Neo-Integralism, Conciliar Traditions, and Political Representation

Church-Life Journal

14 Pages Posted: 18 Feb 2021

See all articles by Julian G. Waller

Julian G. Waller

George Washington University - Department of Political Science

Date Written: December 9, 2020

Abstract

A curious lacuna exists in neo-integralist rhetoric online and in most writing related to fundamental questions of political regime. Quite simply, there is very little said at all about representative political institutions, electoral politics, or about democracy itself among neo-integralists at present. This is strange, as the intellectual predecessors of today’s neo-integralism often explicitly included representational bodies of one sort of another in their sociopolitical visions, even their outright authoritarian variants. Whether one is making an neo-integralist friendly case for moderate forms of illiberal, statist conservatism or more full-throated neo-integralist arguments proper, failing to treat political regime and institutions of representation seriously, especially within the context of the American republic, is a unhelpful omission that regrettably encourages suspicion rather than productive debate.

Keywords: Illiberalism, Integralism, Political Catholicism, Political Institutions

Suggested Citation

Waller, Julian G., Neo-Integralism, Conciliar Traditions, and Political Representation (December 9, 2020). Church-Life Journal, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3779539

Julian G. Waller (Contact Author)

George Washington University - Department of Political Science ( email )

Washington, DC 20052
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
30
Abstract Views
153
PlumX Metrics