Growth, Income Distribution, and Well-Being: Comparisons Across Space and Time
56 Pages Posted: 12 Feb 2003
Date Written: January 2003
Abstract
We use several well-being measures that combine average income with a measure of inequality to undertake international, intertemporal, and global comparisons of well-being. The conclusions emerging from the analysis are that our well-being measures drastically change our impression of well-being levels at the national and, more so, at the global level. They also significantly affect the ranking of countries, when compared to rankings based on real incomes. The impact of these measures on temporal trends in well-being is small on average, but significant for a number of countries where inequality changed considerably in past decades. These results appear not very sensitive to the data on inequality which this analysis is based upon. However, since the inclusion of inequality has an important impact on well-being comparisons, it is of great importance to generate intertemporally as well as internationally comparable data on inequality that are necessary for such comparisons.
JEL Classification: I31, D63
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
By David Dollar and Aart Kraay
-
Growth Still is Good for the Poor
By David Dollar, Tatjana Kleineberg, ...
-
What Can New Survey Data Tell Us About Recent Changes in Distribution and Poverty?
By Martin Ravallion and Shaohua Chen
-
By David Dollar and Aart Kraay
-
How Did the World's Poorest Fare in the 1990s?
By Shaohua Chen and Martin Ravallion
-
Inequality and Growth: What Can the Data Say?
By Abhijit V. Banerjee and Esther Duflo
-
Inequality and Growth: What Can the Data Say?
By Abhijit V. Banerjee and Esther Duflo
-
True World Income Distribution, 1988 and 1993: First Calculation Based on Household Surveys Alone