Tone at the Bottom: Measuring Corporate Misconduct Risk from the Text of Employee Reviews

Management Science: Accepted/Forthcoming

44 Pages Posted: 26 May 2021 Last revised: 29 Jul 2021

See all articles by Dennis Campbell

Dennis Campbell

Harvard University - Accounting & Control Unit

Ruidi Shang

Tilburg University - Tilburg School of Economics and Management

Date Written: July 25, 2021

Abstract

This paper examines whether information extracted via text-based statistical methods applied to employee reviews left on the website Glassdoor.com can be used to develop indicators of corporate misconduct risk. We argue that inside information on the incidence of misconduct, as well as the control environments and broader organizational cultures that contribute to its occurrence, are likely to be widespread among employees and to be reflected in the text of these reviews. Our results show that information extracted from such text can be used to develop measures that clearly separate high and low misconduct risk firms. In out-of-sample tests, our measures are incrementally useful in predicting corporate misconduct beyond other readily observable characteristics such as firm size, performance, industry risk, violation history, and press coverage. We provide further evidence on the efficacy of our text-based measures of misconduct risk by showing that they are associated with future employee whistleblower complaints even after controlling for these same observable characteristics.

Suggested Citation

Campbell, Dennis and Shang, Ruidi, Tone at the Bottom: Measuring Corporate Misconduct Risk from the Text of Employee Reviews (July 25, 2021). Management Science: Accepted/Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3850554

Dennis Campbell

Harvard University - Accounting & Control Unit ( email )

Soldiers Field
Boston, MA 02163
United States

Ruidi Shang (Contact Author)

Tilburg University - Tilburg School of Economics and Management ( email )

P.O. Box 90153
Tilburg, 5000 LE
Netherlands

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,449
Abstract Views
4,325
Rank
24,846
PlumX Metrics