Can ADR Improve Expert Evidence?

Nick Wray-Jones & Jason M Chin, “Can ADR improve expert evidence?” (2021) 95 The Australian Law Journal 467.

27 Pages Posted: 21 Jun 2021

See all articles by Nick Wray-Jones

Nick Wray-Jones

Independent

Jason Chin

Australian National University (ANU) - College of Law

Date Written: June 9, 2021

Abstract

Courts have developed numerous procedures to regulate expert evidence. These procedures aim, in large part, to manage experts’ biases. Recently, the Land Court of Queensland created a new procedure called Court Managed Expert Evidence (CMEE). CMEE’s innovation is the addition of an alternative dispute resolution component – an individual who works with experts and lawyers to manage disputes regarding experts’ opinions. In this article, the authors evaluate this advance against the backdrop of the psychology of bias and ADR’s capacity to limit that bias, as well as an interview with President Kingham, who developed CMEE. They conclude CMEE provides some innovations that may counter expert bias in ways existing procedures cannot. Still, it is inherently limited due to the unconscious nature of many biases and the fact that it does not demand reliable knowledge. The authors suggest others consider implementing CMEE, especially in complex matters where the benefits outweigh the costs.

Keywords: Expert evidence, ADR, unconscious bias, law and psychology, expert bias

JEL Classification: K10

Suggested Citation

Wray-Jones, Nick and Chin, Jason, Can ADR Improve Expert Evidence? (June 9, 2021). Nick Wray-Jones & Jason M Chin, “Can ADR improve expert evidence?” (2021) 95 The Australian Law Journal 467., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3863689

Nick Wray-Jones

Independent ( email )

United States

Jason Chin (Contact Author)

Australian National University (ANU) - College of Law ( email )

Australia

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
74
Abstract Views
552
Rank
576,227
PlumX Metrics