A Note on Non-Discriminatory Access to Railroad Infrastructure
US Department of Justice Antitrust Division Economic Analysis Group Working Paper No. EAG03-5
20 Pages Posted: 22 Apr 2003
Date Written: March 17, 2003
Abstract
The setting of user prices for enterprises with large fixed costs and marginal costs below average costs - "natural monopolies" - raises important policy questions regarding both efficiency and equity. It has become well accepted among economists that, in a variety of settings, welfare may be improved if such prices are set using systems that are non-linear or discriminatory - for example, two-part tariffs and Ramsey pricing. If these pricing schemes are ruled out, the principal alternatives are large government subsidies and the inefficiencies of fully allocated cost pricing. Why should the setting of access prices be any different?
Keywords: rail, restructuring, vertical separation, access charge, discrimination, Russia
JEL Classification: D43, H2, L51, L9, L92
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Vertical Restructuring of the Infrastructure Sectors of Transition Economies
-
Privatization and Regulatory Reform in Brazil: The Case of Freight Railways
By Antonio Estache, Andrea Goldstein, ...
-
Politics, Institutions, and Outcomes: Electricity Regulation in Argentina and Chile
-
Railroad Restructuring in Russia and Central and Eastern Europe: One Solution for All Problems?
By Elizaveta Cheviakhova, Guido Friebel, ...
-
Competition and Price Dispersion in International Long Distance Calling
-
Rail Reform Strategies: The Australian Experience
By Helen Owens
-
By Michel Kerf and Damien Geradin