Experimental Longtermist Jurisprudence

S. Magen & K. Prochownik (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Philosophy of Law (Forthcoming)

LPP Working Paper No. 2-2021

36 Pages Posted: 1 Oct 2021 Last revised: 8 Nov 2022

See all articles by Eric Martínez

Eric Martínez

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT); Institute for Law & AI

Christoph Winter

Harvard University; Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México; Legal Priorities Project

Date Written: December 31, 2021

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to introduce a new research field within experimental jurisprudence—which we refer to as experimental longtermist jurisprudence—aimed at informing legal-philosophical, doctrinal, and policy debates relating to the long-term future, and in particular the interests of future generations. Historically, the interests of future generations have been neglected by legal systems, which fail to grant them democratic representation in the legislature, standing to bring forth a lawsuit in the judiciary, and serious consideration in cost-benefit analyses in the executive. Recently, this neglect has increasingly been called into question based on normative philosophical arguments relating to the value of future generations; empirical evidence relating to the severity of the risks faced by future generations relative to those faced by previous generations; and legal reforms attempting to codify the interests of future generations via constitutional provisions. Experimental longtermist jurisprudence uses methods from experimental psychology to help identify the source of this disconnect, and in turn to help determine the appropriate level and form of legal protection for future generations. In this chapter we (a) provide an overview of the substantive and methodological underpinnings of experimental longtermist jurisprudence; (b) introduce three research programs within experimental longtermist jurisprudence; and (c) discuss the normative implications of each of these three research programs

Keywords: Legal longtermism, Future generations, Levels of abstraction, Longtermist jurisprudence, Experimental jurisprudence

Suggested Citation

Martínez, Eric and Winter, Christoph, Experimental Longtermist Jurisprudence (December 31, 2021). S. Magen & K. Prochownik (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Philosophy of Law (Forthcoming), LPP Working Paper No. 2-2021, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3933618

Eric Martínez (Contact Author)

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) ( email )

77 Massachusetts Avenue
50 Memorial Drive
Cambridge, MA 02139-4307
United States

Institute for Law & AI ( email )

Christoph Winter

Harvard University ( email )

1875 Cambridge Street
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.christophwinter.net/

Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México ( email )

Río Hondo 1
Mexico City, D.F. 01000, Federal District 01080
Mexico

Legal Priorities Project ( email )

1427 Cambridge St
#5
Cambridge, MA 02139
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
252
Abstract Views
1,117
Rank
220,851
PlumX Metrics