The Latin Monetary Union: Some Evidence on Europe's Failed Common Currency
Review of Development Finance, Vol. 1, pp. 131-149, 2011
53 Pages Posted: 5 Aug 2003 Last revised: 25 May 2011
Date Written: July 1, 2003
Abstract
The Latin Monetary Union was initiated in 1865 by France, Belgium, Italy, and Switzerland. We find that LMU membership or adoption of a gold standard is frequently associated with lower volatility of private bill yields, bond yields, inflation, and deviations from Purchasing Power Parity. However, neither standard induces convergence with LMU leader France or gold standard leader Great Britain. Bond yield spreads indicate that adoption of the gold standard is more credible than membership of the LMU. Italy is an outlier, perhaps due to errant fiscal and monetary policies. A comparison to the modern EMS/EMU confirms that the LMU was a weaker and less credible currency arrangement.
Keywords: Currency union, European Monetary Union, EMU, Latin Monetary Union
JEL Classification: E5, F3, F4
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
After the Deluge: Do Fixed Exchange Rates Allow Inter-Temporal Volatility Tradeoffs?
-
Singapore's Unique Monetary Policy: How Does it Work?
By Eric Parrado
-
Monetary Policy Regimes and Macroeconomic Outcomes: Hong Kong and Singapore
-
The Stabilizing Effect of the Erm on Exchange Rates and Interest Rates: An Empirical Investigation
-
A VAR Analysis of the Effects of Monetary Policy in East Asia
-
Exchange Rate Volatility and Macroeconomic Performance in Hong Kong.
-
Equity Price Dynamics Before and after the Introduction of the Euro: A Note
By Yin-wong Cheung and Frank Westermann
-
Persistence of Output Fluctuations Under Alternative Exchange Rate Regimes
-
By John Qi Zhu