Managing the 'Expectations Gap' in Investor Protection: The Sec and the Post-Enron Reform Agenda
29 Pages Posted: 8 Dec 2003
There are 2 versions of this paper
Managing the 'Expectations Gap' in Investor Protection: The Sec and the Post-Enron Reform Agenda
Abstract
One of the underlying questions in the aftermath of the Enron and comparable scandals is whether securities regulation failed, and if so, what kind of fix is appropriate. To answer that, we have to confront an apparent expectations gap in what the law can accomplish. Some investors (and politicians) seek greater confidence than is practicable and the SEC has the political incentive to contribute to a mythology of market integrity - and then manage the fallout when corruption surfaces. This paper explores the SEC's political situation and then moves on to discuss various reforms - including some in the recently enacted Sarbanes Oxley Act - designed to improve investor protection. While some reforms do indeed improve securities regulation at the margin, an expectations gap remains.
Keywords: Enron, Corporate Governance, Securities Law, Securities Regulation, Corporate Law, Sarbanes-Oxley
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Economic Consequences of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
By Ivy Zhang
-
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Making of Quack Corporate Governance
-
Corporate Governance and Firm Value: the Impact of the 2002 Governance Rules
-
Market Reaction to Events Surrounding the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Earnings Management
By Haidan Li, Morton Pincus, ...
-
Why Do Firms Go Dark? Causes and Economic Consequences of Voluntary SEC Deregistrations
By Christian Leuz, Alexander J. Triantis, ...
-
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Firms' Going-Private Decisions
By Ellen Engel, Rachel M. Hayes, ...
-
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Security Market Behavior: Early Evidence
By Zabihollah Rezaee and Pankaj K. Jain