Signalling and Commitment: Monetary Versus Inflation Targeting
38 Pages Posted: 12 Jan 2004
Date Written: December 2003
Abstract
This Paper compares the social efficiency of monetary targeting and inflation targeting when central banks may have private information on shocks to money demand and, because of verifiability problems, the transparency solution is not feasible. Under inflation targeting and monetary targeting, central banks may have an incentive to signal their private information in order to influence the public's expectations about future inflation. We show that inflation targeting is superior to monetary targeting as it makes it easier for central banks to commit to low inflation. Moreover, central banks that are weak on inflation prefer inflation targeting to monetary targeting.
Keywords: Central banks, inflation targeting, monetary targeting, signalling, commitment
JEL Classification: E50, E52, E58
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Transparency and Credibility: Monetary Policy with Unobservable Goals
By Jon Faust and Lars E. O. Svensson
-
Social Value of Public Information: Morris and Shin (2002) is Actually Pro Transparency, Not Con
-
Transparency of Information and Coordination in Economies with Investment Complementarities
-
Transparency of Information and Coordination in Economies with Investment Complementarities
-
Efficient Use of Information and Social Value of Information