Forecasting Daily Variability of the S&P 100 Stock Index Using Historical, Realised and Implied Volatility Measurements

Tinbergen Institute Working Paper No. TI 04-016/4

32 Pages Posted: 13 Feb 2004

See all articles by Siem Jan Koopman

Siem Jan Koopman

Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - School of Business and Economics; Tinbergen Institute; Aarhus University - CREATES

Borus Jungbacker

VU University Amsterdam - Department of Economics

Eugenie Hol Uspensky

University of Birmingham - Department of Accounting and Finance; Free University Amsterdam

Date Written: January 29, 2004

Abstract

The increasing availability of financial market data at intraday frequencies has not only led to the development of improved volatility measurements but has also inspired research into their potential value as an information source for volatility forecasting. In this paper we explore the forecasting value of historical volatility (extracted from daily return series), of implied volatility (extracted from option pricing data) and of realised volatility (computed as the sum of squared high frequency returns within a day). First we consider unobserved components and long memory models for realised volatility which is regarded as an accurate estimator of volatility. The predictive abilities of realised volatility models are compared with those of stochastic volatility models and generalised autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models for daily return series. These historical volatility models are extended to include realised and implied volatility measures as explanatory variables for volatility. The main focus is on forecasting the daily variability of the Standard & Poor's 100 stock index series for which trading data (tick by tick) of almost seven years is analysed. The forecast assessment is based on the hypothesis of whether a forecast model is outperformed by alternative models. In particular, we will use superior predictive ability tests to investigate the relative forecast performances of some models. Since volatilities are not observed, realised volatility is taken as a proxy for actual volatility and is used for computing the forecast error. A stationary bootstrap procedure is required for computing the test statistic and its p-value. The empirical results show convincingly that realised volatility models produce far more accurate volatility forecasts compared to models based on daily returns. Long memory models seem to provide the most accurate forecasts.

Keywords: Generalised autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity model, Long memory model, Realised volatility, Stochastic volatility model, Superior predictive ability, Unobserved components

JEL Classification: C22, C53, G15

Suggested Citation

Koopman, Siem Jan and Jungbacker, Borus and Hol Uspensky, Eugenie, Forecasting Daily Variability of the S&P 100 Stock Index Using Historical, Realised and Implied Volatility Measurements (January 29, 2004). Tinbergen Institute Working Paper No. TI 04-016/4, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=499744 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.499744

Siem Jan Koopman (Contact Author)

Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - School of Business and Economics ( email )

De Boelelaan 1105
Amsterdam, 1081 HV
Netherlands
+31205986019 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://sjkoopman.net

Tinbergen Institute ( email )

Gustav Mahlerplein 117
1082 MS Amsterdam
Netherlands

HOME PAGE: http://personal.vu.nl/s.j.koopman

Aarhus University - CREATES ( email )

School of Economics and Management
Building 1322, Bartholins Alle 10
DK-8000 Aarhus C
Denmark

Borus Jungbacker

VU University Amsterdam - Department of Economics ( email )

De Boelelaan 1105
1081 HV Amsterdam
Netherlands

Eugenie Hol Uspensky

University of Birmingham - Department of Accounting and Finance ( email )

Birmingham B15 2TT, Birmingham B15 2TT
United Kingdom

Free University Amsterdam

Amsterdam, ND North Holland
Netherlands

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,082
Abstract Views
3,984
Rank
37,913
PlumX Metrics