Informal Risk-Sharing in an Infinite-Horizon Experiment
41 Pages Posted: 1 Mar 2004
Date Written: June 2006
Abstract
This paper presents the first laboratory study of risk-sharing without commitment. Our experiment captures the main features of a simple model of voluntary insurance between two agents. In the model, two individuals interact over a potential infinite horizon and suffer random income shocks. Risk-averse individuals have incentives to smooth consumption by making transfers to each other. These transfers being voluntary, only self-enforcing risk-sharing arrangements are possible: transfers can never be so large as to tempt individuals to renege on them. This constraint, when binding, has strong implications for the shape of the constrained optimal risk-sharing arrangement.
In our experiment, participants are matched in pairs. Each period, one of them, randomly drawn, receives a given amount h in addition to its regular income. After observing both incomes, each person in a pair chooses a non-negative transfer to make to the other person. Two features of the experimental design are crucial. First, it is common information that all pairs will be dissolved at the end of each period with a given probability. Participants are informed when this occurs and randomly re-matched. This replicates the effect of infinite-horizon and discounting in the model. Second, at the end of the experiment, a unique period is randomly drawn to count for cash payment. This feature is essential to isolate for the utility outcome of each period.
We find evidence generally consistent with risk sharing, with higher transfers coming from individuals who received h in the period. Moreover, in support of the theory, transfers are much higher with a higher continuation probability and they also are highly correlated with the individual's degree of risk aversion. However, while the model predicts an increase in transfers with ex ante inequality, we observe the opposite effect. This may reflect considerations of identity or group membership.
Keywords: Experiments, gift exchange, informal insurance, risk-sharing, social preferences
JEL Classification: A49, C91, C92, D31, D81, O17
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
The Economic Lives of the Poor
By Abhijit V. Banerjee and Esther Duflo
-
The Economic Lives of the Poor
By Abhijit V. Banerjee and Esther Duflo
-
Returns to Capital in Microenterprises: Evidence from a Field Experiment
By Suresh De Mel, David J. Mckenzie, ...
-
Returns to Capital in Microenterprises: Evidence from a Field Experiment
By Suresh De Mel, David J. Mckenzie, ...
-
Entitled to Work: Urban Property Rights and Labor Supply in Peru
By Erica Field
-
Savings Constraints and Microenterprise Development: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Kenya
By Pascaline Dupas and Jonathan Robinson
-
Measuring Microenterprise Profits: Don't Ask How the Sausage is Made
By Suresh De Mel, David J. Mckenzie, ...
-
The Return to Capital in Ghana
By Christopher Udry and Santosh Anagol
-
The Shape of Temptation: Implications for the Economic Lives of the Poor
-
The Shape of Temptation: Implications for the Economic Lives of the Poor