Searching Ordered Sets: Evaluations from Sequences Under Search
28 Pages Posted: 14 Apr 2004
Abstract
Consumers often search for and choose from ordered sets; commonly from options listed from best to worst. Normatively, such declining orderings maximize expected value from search and should lead to more positive evaluations of the experience compared to searching improving orderings. We demonstrate, however, that amount of search moderates consumers' evaluations of declining versus improving orderings. Search from different orderings exposes consumers to sequences of options characterized by different key psychological moments (trend and end) as well as to different levels of average quality. Greater search can lead to more positive evaluations for improving versus declining orderings because consumers experience more positive moments to base their evaluation on. Supporting the proposed model, we show that overall evaluations are influenced by differences in these key moments over and above quality changes of the set.
Keywords: Information search, judgment and decision making, E-commerce/internet, satisfaction
JEL Classification: M30, D83, D90
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
By Christopher K. Hsee, Peter Salovey, ...
-
By Rajagopal Raghunathan and Kim Corfman
-
Hedonic Versus Informational Evaluations: Task Dependent Preferences for Sequences of Outcomes
By Gal Zauberman, Kristin Diehl, ...
-
When Consumers Choose to Restrict Their Options: Anticipated Regret and Choice Set Size Preference
By Cenk Bülbül and Tom Meyvis
-
By Suresh Ramanathan and Ann L. Mcgill
-
When Experience Does Not Matter: On the Non-Impact of Real-Time Hedonic Experiences
By Joseph Nunes and Nathan Novemsky