Capital Regulation for Position Risk in Banks, Securities Firms and Insurance Companies
Wharton Financial Institutions Working Paper No. 04-11
108 Pages Posted: 26 Jul 2004
Date Written: October 2003
Abstract
We examine why these regulatory differences exist and what they imply for differences in minimum capital requirements for position risk. We consider differences in the definition and measurement of regulatory capital and we quantify differences in the capital charges for position risk by reference to a model portfolio that contains a variety of financial instruments including equity, fixed income instruments, swaps, foreign exchange positions, and options - instruments that may appear in the portfolios of securities firms, banks or insurance companies. For most leading firms in the financial services industry, however, market forces, not minimum regulatory capital requirements, appear to play the dominant role in firms' capital decisions. Thus we conclude by considering measures to enhance market discipline.
Keywords: Risk management, Value-at-Risk, Capital Regulation, Market Risk
JEL Classification: G21, G28
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
How Accurate are Value-at-Risk Models at Commercial Banks
By Jeremy Berkowitz and James M. O'brien
-
The Predictive Ability of Several Models of Exchange Rate Volatility
By Kenneth D. West and Dongchul Cho
-
Bank Capital and Value at Risk
By Patricia Jackson, David Maude, ...
-
Bank Capital Requirements for Market Risk: The Internal Models Approach
By Darryll Hendricks and Beverly Hirtle