Damages for 'Wrongful Birth': Where to after Cattanach?

18 Pages Posted: 30 Aug 2004

See all articles by Martin Vranken

Martin Vranken

University of Melbourne - Law School

Abstract

In Cattanach v Melchior a majority of the High Court of Australia held that damages for wrongful birth can include compensation for the cost of raising a healthy child. The case raises questions about what it is that constitutes harm for purposes of bringing a claim in negligence. This article critically reviews the High Court decision in light of the continental-European experience. It is suggested that the recent House of Lords decision in Rees offers a workable compromise for both proponents and opponents of compensation.

Keywords: Australia, High Court of Australia, tort, damages, wrongful birth, negligence, House of Lords, compensation

JEL Classification: K13

Suggested Citation

Vranken, Martin, Damages for 'Wrongful Birth': Where to after Cattanach?. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=583601

Martin Vranken (Contact Author)

University of Melbourne - Law School ( email )

University Square
185 Pelham Street, Carlton
Victoria, Victoria 3010
Australia

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
485
Abstract Views
3,417
Rank
108,861
PlumX Metrics