Delayed it Usage: Is it Really the Drag on Europe's Productivity?
IGIER Working Paper No. 267
25 Pages Posted: 6 Sep 2004
Date Written: August 2004
Abstract
This paper explores the quantitative plausibility of three candidate explanations for the European productivity slowdown with respect to the US. The empirical plausibility of the common wisdom on the topic (the IT usage hypothesis) is found to crucially depend on how IT-using industries are defined. If a narrow definition is chosen, the IT usage hypothesis no longer explains the whole of the EU productivity slowdown but just about 55% of it, with the remaining part to be attributed to other factors than IT, as argued in the "IT irrelevance" view. No room is left for IT-producing industries as another potential vehicle for the US-EU productivity growth gap, instead.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
The Resurgence of Growth in the Late 1990s: Is Information Technology the Story?
-
Does the "New Economy" Measure Up to the Great Inventions of the Past?
-
Energy Efficiency, User Cost Changes, and the Measurement of Durable Goods Prices
-
Information Technology and the U.S. Productivity Revival: What Do the Industry Data Say?
-
Computing Productivity: Firm-Level Evidence
By Erik Brynjolfsson and Lorin M. Hitt
-
Economic Growth in the OECD Area: Recent Trends at the Aggregate and Sectoral Level
By Stefano Scarpetta, Andrea Bassanini, ...