Hoist with Their Own Petard?

22 Pages Posted: 6 Sep 2004

Abstract

In 2003, Congress and the Department of Justice tried to increase their control over the United States Sentencing Commission and federal sentencing generally. Congress appeared to have achieved this goal when it passed the Prosecutorial Remedies and Tools Against the Exploitation of Children Today Act of 2003 (PROTECT Act), which resulted in reduced grounds for downward departures, Congressionally-revised text of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, and a constrained Sentencing Commission potentially devoid of judges. Yet pro-government interpretations of the PROTECT Act may have been premature because the Supreme Court has now struck down parts of Washington State's legislatively-enacted sentencing guidelines in Blakely v. Washington. In an effort to save the Federal Sentencing Guidelines from Blakely's grasp, the Department of Justice has emphasized that they are administratively enacted, in contrast to Washington's legislatively-enacted guidelines. As a factual matter, however, the PROTECT Act blurred the federal administrative versus legislative distinction. Thus, Congress and the Department - the architects of the PROTECT Act - may find themselves hoist with their own petard.

Keywords: Apprendi, Blakely, crime, criminal procedure, Feeney Amendment, jury, PROTECT Act, sentencing, sentencing guidelines, Sixth Amendment, Supreme Court

Suggested Citation

Chanenson, Steven L., Hoist with Their Own Petard?. Villanova Law/Public Policy Research Paper No. 2004-15, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=586782

Steven L. Chanenson (Contact Author)

Villanova University School of Law ( email )

299 N. Spring Mill Road
Villanova, PA 19085
United States
610-519-7459 (Phone)
610-519-6472 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
115
Abstract Views
1,755
Rank
433,058
PlumX Metrics