The Applicability of Choice of Law Rules in a Question of Jurisdiction: Metall Und Rohstoff and the Ts Havprins Revisited

Posted: 13 Oct 2004

See all articles by Kelvin Fatt Kin Low

Kelvin Fatt Kin Low

The University of Hong Kong - Faculty of Law; Singapore Management University - Yong Pung How School of Law

Abstract

Order 11 rule 1 of the Rules of Court, which has been described as representing the 'exorbitant' extra-territorial jurisdiction of the courts, comprises some 19 sub-rules which lay down the various instances in which such jurisdiction may be exercised. . . . The cases of Metall und Rohstoff AG v Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Inc [[1990] 1 QB [Queen's Bench] 391] and The TS Havprins [[1983] 2 Lloyd's Rep 356] appear to highlight the differing approaches that the English courts have adopted in the interpretation of the English equivalent of Ord 11 r 1. . . .

Keywords: Civil procedure, choice of law, extra-territorial jurisdiction, Singapore

JEL Classification: K41

Suggested Citation

Low, Kelvin Fatt Kin, The Applicability of Choice of Law Rules in a Question of Jurisdiction: Metall Und Rohstoff and the Ts Havprins Revisited. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=602123

Kelvin Fatt Kin Low (Contact Author)

The University of Hong Kong - Faculty of Law ( email )

K.K. Leung Building, 4th Floor
Pokfulam Road
Hong Kong

Singapore Management University - Yong Pung How School of Law

55 Armenian Street
Singapore, 179943
Singapore

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
1,171
PlumX Metrics