Why Paper Mills Clean Up: Determinants of Pollution Abatement in Four Asian Countries

40 Pages Posted: 20 Apr 2016

See all articles by David Wheeler

David Wheeler

World Bank - Policy Research Department

Mainul Huq

World Bank

Date Written: June 1995

Abstract

Clean production is not uncommon even in very poor countries such as Bangladesh. Even when there is no formal regulation of pollution, large, efficient, domestically owned plants operating near relatively affluent communities have demonstrated excellent environmental performance. The same cannot be said for manufacturing facilities near poor communities.

Formal regulation of industrial pollution control standards has been hampered in some developing countries by the absence of a clear regulatory framework, by limited institutional capacity, and by limited information on emissions. For many manufacturing facilities in developing economies, the government-imposed price of pollution is zero.

Yet Hartman, Huq, and Wheeler find strong evidence that despite weak or nonexistent formal regulation and enforcement of environmental standards, many plants in South and Southeast Asia are clean. Of course, many plants are also among the world's worst polluters. To account for the extreme variation among plants, the authors review evidence from a survey of pollution abatement by 26 pulp and paper plants in four countries: Bangladesh, India, Indonesia, and Thailand.

They find that the level of pollution abatement is significantly affected by three factors. Abatement is:

Positively associated with scale and competitiveness.

Negatively associated with public ownership.

Unaffected by foreign links (in ownership or financing).

A clear source of interplant differences is the level of community pressure, or informal regulation. Some communities successfully pressure plants to abate pollution even if they have little or no support from formal regulation. High local income is a powerful predictor of effective informal regulation.

The authors also find that policy matters. Privatization, to the extent that it increases plant efficiency, can significantly improve environmental performance. As private ownership, competitiveness, and per capital incomes rise, communities may be in a better position to exert strong local pressure on polluting facilities to clean up production.

The government may need to intervene to prevent environmental injustice in communities whose citizens are mostly poor, poorly educated, or members of marginalized minority groups (and hence less capable of applying local pressure on firms and less likely to be knowledgeable about pollution). To compensate, national regulators may want to consider strategies for improving participation in pollution control in those communities, and for targeting regulation to the problems of poor communities.

This paper - a product of the Environment, Infrastructure, and Agriculture Division, Policy Research Department - is part of a departmental study funded by the Bank's Research Support Budget, Enterprise Ownership and Pollution (RPO 677-44).

Suggested Citation

Wheeler, David and Huq, Mainul, Why Paper Mills Clean Up: Determinants of Pollution Abatement in Four Asian Countries (June 1995). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=604921

David Wheeler (Contact Author)

World Bank - Policy Research Department ( email )

1818 H Street N.W.
Washington, DC 20433
United States

HOME PAGE: http://econ.worldbank.org/staff/dwheeler

Mainul Huq

World Bank ( email )

1818 H Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20433
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
145
Abstract Views
1,540
Rank
362,884
PlumX Metrics