Hedge Fund Benchmarks: A Risk-Based Approach

Posted: 5 Nov 2004

See all articles by William Fung

William Fung

PI Asset Management, LLC

David A. Hsieh

Duke University - Fuqua School of Business; Duke University - Department of Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

Abstract

Following a review of the data and methodological difficulties in applying conventional models used for traditional asset class indexes to hedge funds, this article argues against the conventional approach. Instead, in an extension of previous work on asset-based style (ABS) factors, the article proposes a model of hedge fund returns that is similar to models based on arbitrage pricing theory, with dynamic risk-factor coefficients. For diversified hedge fund portfolios (as proxied by indexes of hedge funds and funds of hedge funds), the seven ABS factors can explain up to 80 percent of monthly return variations. Because ABS factors are directly observable from market prices, this model provides a standardized framework for identifying differences among major hedge fund indexes that is free of the biases inherent in hedge fund databases.

Keywords: Portfolio Management: Hedge Fund Strategies, Alternative Investments: Hedge Fund Strategies, Risk Measurement and Management: Alternative Investments

Suggested Citation

Fung, William (Bill) and Hsieh, David Arthur, Hedge Fund Benchmarks: A Risk-Based Approach. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=614512

William (Bill) Fung (Contact Author)

PI Asset Management, LLC ( email )

79 Wellington Street West
Suite 3500
Toronto, Ontario M5K 1K7
Canada

David Arthur Hsieh

Duke University - Fuqua School of Business ( email )

Department of Finance
Box 90120
Durham, NC 27708-0120
United States
919-660-7779 (Phone)
919-660-7961 (Fax)

Duke University - Department of Economics ( email )

213 Social Sciences Building
Box 90097
Durham, NC 27708-0204
United States

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
3,640
PlumX Metrics